Monday, 29 January 2018

How To Use Accelerated Learning Techniques To Learn Any New Skill Quickly – With Jonathan Levi


Olly: Jonathan, welcome to the show, I’m super excited to have you here. I’ve been wanting to pin you down so we could have a proper chat for quite some time now. Why don’t you just take a second and tell people who is Jonathan Levy. Jonathan Levy: First off, thanks for having me, Olly, it’s always a pleasure to kind of mind meld and chat with you, so I’m really looking forward to the call. Who is Jonathan Levy? I ask myself that every day, because it seems to be a dynamic answer.
Essentially, I’m a lifelong entrepreneur, a serial entrepreneur. Currently, my current life’s work is teaching people accelerated learning. I struggled as a student, I was always kind of a problem child. I was sort of, kind of diagnosed with ADD. My parents didn’t want to actually send me in, but basically diagnosed with ADD by a special education teacher when I was eight years old. That was kind of the point when I realized that I was a little bit different and other kids seem to get this stuff and I don’t. That kind of culminated or led to me being pretty heavily medicated for most of my adolescent life, bouts with depression, anxiety, low self esteem, just because I wasn’t learning. It wasn’t just classroom learning, it was pretty depressing that other kids were getting good grades and I wasn’t, but it was also learning around different social skills and learning around sports. I never seemed to be able to learn as quickly as other people, and I thought that was odd, because I knew I was a smart kid.
People told me I was smart, but I didn’t seem to be successful academically. Medication was great, and if anyone out there struggles with ADD the way that I did, medication in many ways saved my life, at least academically and professionally. I still would forget everything as soon as I left the exam room, and that all changed for me in 2011. I had kind of packed up, gone to this venture capital firm, and I was doing an internship before starting my Master’s degree. I don’t know about you, but I suffered through my undergraduate degree. I went in as Environmental Economics, that was too hard, I was trying to also run a business on the side. That was too time consuming, too much reading, had to dumb it down. Then I went to Anthropology, that was too hard. So, I ended up changing my major three times, because I couldn’t get through the reading. I ended up on Sociology, which was kind of light reading and more writing than reading, I was always an okay writer.
I knew this time I wasn’t going to be able to do that, I was going for a Master’s in a specific subject. I wasn’t going to be able to cop out in the middle and change my major if it was too hard. It was a condensed program, so eight months to do two years of material. As soon as I was admitted, they gave me 1107 pages of reading. I was like; what the hell am I going to do? I got really lucky, because at that time I met someone who was a speed reader and a memory expert. It turns out he and his wife had developed these techniques for teaching children with learning disabilities, and it’s a lot of the stuff that probably your audience knows. It’s the basic speed reading stuff that you’ve probably heard a million times, or maybe haven’t heard at all, and mnemonic techniques. I’ve always been a hacker, I’ve always been really interested – I’ve got photos from when I was 18 years old of me hooking myself up to metabolic machines and trying to find out what my VO2 max is. I’ve always been interested in that, and I tried speed reading a few different times and it never worked, I never absorbed anything, but opening up this whole world of mnemonic techniques was like magic to me.
Suddenly I could remember things, I could read things. I ended up going on to do this MBA and be able to just power through reading. Essentially to make a long story somewhat shorter, I found myself making a career out of reteaching these skills, which I had been taught in Hebrew. Translating them to English and finding a way that everyone could learn them, not just people who were able to afford expensive private tutoring. Olly: There’s so many questions I want to ask you just stemming from that. Let me ask you this; as a kid were you aware of the challenges that you were facing? Sometimes when you’re young, the problems that you face you don’t necessarily understand what they are. So, were you aware at that time I’ve got a learning problem, or I’ve got ADD? Were you aware of that, of what you were facing? Jonathan: Yes.
I kind of knew in first grade, because I started getting report cards that my parents had to have serious conversations with. I recently went back, because you know we have this tendency, especially in the industry you and I are, to look back at our biography and be like it all makes sense, but I went back and said did it all make sense? Along about the time I did my TED talk, I really asked myself the question and I pulled it out and first grade it was Jonathan needs to pay more attention, Jonathan needs to understand that being the class clown is not a way to get ahead, Jonathan needs to sit still, Jonathan is falling behind the class, and they just got worse and worse.
Olly: So you knew it was a problem. Jonathan: Oh, I knew, and also I had this tendency where I’d have to go in and have – I remember the first thing that I fell behind was reading a clock. So, in first grade you learn how to read a non-digital clock, and I remember I just couldn’t get this. I remember it was so bizarre, it says 10, how is that 50 minutes? I didn’t get it, and I had this kind of tendency where I’d have to go in, someone would have to explain something to me, the next thing that was really hard for me was multiplication tables, and then I had in this moment – I don’t know if you’ve ever had this, I don’t know if normal people have this – when someone would explain it to me and it would click, I would almost start like laughing and crying, because it would be like oh, and my eyes would well up.
It was like oh, my God, it took me so long to get to this point of understanding, and just overwhelmed with emotion of why couldn’t I have gotten this the first time, why did I have to ask all these questions and figure it out this way. Olly: I’m trying to relate that to my story. I was pretty good at school, I didn’t have any particular – my grades were always good and I was always conscious that I was capable of doing this stuff, but I just was always resisting putting the work in that I needed to. If I knew I had an essay to hand in, I wouldn’t start two or three weeks before like I should, I’d wait until the last evening. I was always kind of like questioning myself, because I knew I was capable of it, but I just couldn’t bring myself to do it. I see a lot of parallels between the Olly who didn’t do as well as he could have done in his history essays and the Olly who, these days, could be so much better at language learning if he could just be strict enough with himself to say, “At a.m., you sit down, you study for an hour.
It’s not hard, that’s what you do”. So, I see a lot of parallels with that. In many ways, I guess I haven’t changed, but you have. You’ve kind of had this realization that many people never get to in their life, and you’ve learned these techniques, which you could easily not have done. Everything could be very different. In a nutshell, we’ll get into these specific things in a minute, but could you give us some like visceral examples of things you’ve been able to do in your life as a direct result of the accelerated learning techniques that you mentioned? Jonathan: Sure. So, I go through ebbs and flows, and by the way, I also want to comment that I have that discipline problem.
Because I am a professional learner, I think we’re all professional learners, but I make a living by demonstrating how effectively I learn, I take on so much stuff. Olly: Do you ever find like maybe you spend more time actually talking about how to do it than actually doing it? It seems like an occupational hazard. Jonathan: Definitely. It’s definitely true. I tend to bite off a lot of learning projects, and I used to beat myself up about it. At any given time, right now I’m learning Russian, improving Hebrew, maintaining Spanish, learning piano and guitar, because one instrument isn’t enough and I’m already 30 years behind all these child prodigies who play piano, acro-yoga, Olympic weightlifting, aerial photography, copy writing, marketing funnels, advertising. I’m learning like 100 different things at once, and I used to beat myself up about it because of exactly what you said, I should buckle down and talk the talk.
I realized the more I learn, the more I’m able to learn, and that by harnessing exactly that ADD and by jumping from subject to subject, something that I learned in copy writing – that’s maybe a bad example, but something that I learned in my fascination with Benjamin Franklin can dramatically alter the way I write copy, and something I learned in Olympic weightlifting can dramatically alter the way that I do acro-yoga. You kind of have to take advantage – a lot of the techniques that we teach are for taking advantage of that passion and figuring out a way to be passionate about things that you maybe don’t actually want to learn, and I’ve learned that you just have to take advantage of that and roll with it. Those are some of the things I’ve been able to learn. I’ve been able to learn public speaking which, obviously, I use pretty regularly. I’ve been able to learn – I’ll give you a classic example. October of 2013, I said to myself – I had figured out that this online learning thing was going to be pretty successful, I’d taken some online courses myself and I was like this is a really cool way to distribute knowledge and it’s a lot more profitable than writing a book, and it’s a lot more engaging, I think this is going to be big.
So, I decided I’m going to build an online course, and I said to myself, “How does one build an online course?” I sat down, I opened 42 browser tabs, and over the course of two days, I knew how to build online courses. I knew how to record video, I knew how to edit video, I knew how to structure the content, I knew what was important, I knew a lot about how these ranking algorithms work on marketplace websites. Within three weeks of launching, we had one of the best selling courses on Udemy, and within a few months of just doing the stuff that I’d learned over the course of a few days, we had one of the best selling courses of all time.
Olly: For those that don’t know, Udemy is an online course marketplace, where you can go and learn pretty much anything. Your course went on to be taken by 60,000 students, is that right? Jonathan: Up to today, 85,000. Olly: Wow, that’s pretty amazing. It’s interesting hearing you say all these things that you’ve been able to do, because there’s tons of stuff I want to do in my life, I couldn’t even begin to name those things. I’d like to learn how to make chocolate, I’d like to be able to illustrate children’s books, that’s something I thought would be super cool. Why don’t I do that? The reason is that I don’t really have a framework for deciding on and learning that skill and taking the action required to do it. I think it’s because part of it is the discipline problem for me, but also it’s like not having the confidence necessarily that I would be able to learn that skill quite quickly.
Jonathan: That’s such a big thing, I want to jump in right there actually, because I just recorded a video about this. One of the kind of beautiful things about what I do is I learn, so I’m always improving. We’ve had to redo our course numerous times, and we constantly improve, and over the last year or so in kind of helping students and diagnosing their issue, I’ve come up with what I call the memory Pygmalion or memory golem affect.
So the Pygmalion effect/golem effect are sides of the same coin. I learned about this in that business school program I talked about, if you’re a manager and you believe that the employee is highly skilled, intelligent, capable, going to be successful, all things being equal, even if you hide your cards, that employee will be successful. However, the golem effect, if you believe the employee is dishonest, so on and so forth, you will actually make them dishonest. There’s a lot of debate about how this actually works, but it works.
People say it’s tone of voice, or it’s facial expression, or it’s subtle little communication cues, whatever it may be – you could call it law of attraction, you could call it energy – it actually works. What I’ve realized is the same is exactly true of ourselves. One of the coolest things about these techniques, and I think it’s very similar to what you do, is I give students these tools and they use these tools and these tools are really powerful, but guess what, even when they don’t use these tools, their memory improves and they become better learners. How can that be? They now go around in the world saying, “I’m an exceptional learner, I have a phenomenal memory”. I’ll tell you a little secret, I use the actual mnemonic techniques that I teach about 40% of the time, and yet I remember nearly everything. People give me an address, I don’t even need to use mnemonic techniques. I could convert it and say that the 77 is a cake and create memory paths, I don’t even need to. If I memorize a credit card I might do it, 16 digits, but if I’m memorizing five digit numbers, I don’t even need it.
It’s simply because of this memory Pygmalion effect. I think so many people go around saying, “I suck at languages, I’m terrible at math, I’m a really slow reader”. Guess what? That is a self fulfilling prophecy. I think the power of these tools is putting that tool in your back pocket so that you can say, “Yes, if I want to go learn chocolate making, that’s a one day thing, I can go learn that”. Olly: Let’s dive into some specifics here. From what I’ve heard, the two main things that you’ve mentioned are memory improvements or memory techniques and speed reading. Can you take maybe one of the skills or activities that you’ve already mentioned and give us an example of how both of those things, the speed reading and the memory techniques could be used to help you learn that thing faster? Jonathan: Sure. So, where I think a lot of courses go wrong and a lot of people have tried speed reading, myself included, and failed is they forget to build the infrastructure up front.
If you’re going to read an entire book in two and a half hours, you better have a pretty incredible way of storing that, and storing it in this auditory, language processing area of the brain is not going to work. You need to store it in a way that world memory champions store 56 decks of cards back to back, store one deck of cards in 26 seconds, and that’s by the same tried and true mnemonic techniques that have been around for 2200 hundred years, with modification and adaptation. It’s visual memory, it’s creating mnemonic techniques, and then it’s the memory palace. If any of these things are foreign to people, I can kind of go into more depth, but it is basically creating these visual mnemonics.
When you pair that on top of speed reading, you’re now able to read things very quickly, take a quick pause, generate these very vivid markers and examples. Then it’s ultimately deconstructing knowledge into core principles that can be visualized. Olly: Let’s pause right there so I can see if I can summarize what you said. The speed reading, I guess it’s fairly obvious, if you’ve got to learn stuff and you’re learning that stuff from a book, you can read it faster if you can read quicker. It stands to reason. The second part though is actually retaining what you have read. When I was reading about your various courses and talks and things earlier on, there was one phrase out of everything that stood out to me. You know what that was? Jonathan: Tell me. Olly: Retain things you read. Now, I guess different elements of this will stick with different people, but for me personally, I get very excited when I read a book. I read slowly, I’m a slow reader. The idea of reading a book in two and a half hours is like how would my life change if that was possible.
You know, I get very excited when I read a book. I’ve just been reading a great book called Deep Work by Cal Newport, which is very well known at the moment, but as I’m reading that book, I’m thinking to myself by this time tomorrow, I will have forgotten this stuff. I’m going to read this book and enjoy it, get all excited and then not retain it. So, that’s why that particular phrase, retain the things you read, really stood out to me. Could you talk a little bit about the significance of that and how you go about doing that? Jonathan: I’ll back pedal a little bit and talk just a little bit of light neuroscience, specifically evolutionary neuroscience as I like to call it. We’re visual creatures. We don’t realize it, but – first and foremost, we have to think what kinds of things would provide a survival advantage to homo sapiens wandering the Serengeti for the last one and a half million years.
It turns out smell and taste, super important. If you remember what rancid food tastes like, that’s a pretty huge survival advantage. If you remember certain different bitter tastes are poison, that’s a pretty big survival advantage. The next most memorable things are location and visual. Do I remember the markings on the faces of the friendly tribe versus the not friendly tribe? Do you know we can identify someone else’s face in about 150 milliseconds? Why would we develop that, why is that so important? If you take two seconds to identify if I’m a friend or foe, and I take 150 milliseconds, which one of us is going to survive the oncoming battle? So, we remember faces, we remember visual information, the exact shade of the berries that are poisonous, the exact color of the snake that’s edible versus the one that’s probably going to kill me. We also remember locations. If you forget where the watering hole is and you’re wandering the Serengeti, you’re dead. If you forget where you buried your winter food supply, you’re dead. So, our brains hold this information. If anyone doesn’t believe me and they say, “Well, I’m not a visual learner, I’m an auditory”, yes, but with this much work, just a tiny bit of work, I can reveal to you that in fact you are a visual, spatial learner just like every other homo sapiens.
The test I like to give people is I want you to imagine your childhood home, even if your parents sold that home 20 years ago. I want you to go into your parent’s bedroom and I want you, even if you were one of those kids who were not allowed in Mom and Dad’s room, I want you to go to your mother’s side of the bed, I want you to tell me what was on the nightstand. You may not have been in that house for 20 years, and I can tell you – Olly: I can do that. Jonathan: Exactly. Most people are like it was a red telephone, and I can say, “Was it a touch tone, or was it not?” The funny thing is you can not just do that for highly significant places, but if I asked you about the last hotel you stayed in and I asked you what side of the shower was the shampoo on, you might just know, and that’s something that you haven’t even reviewed.
So, we do this naturally. To come back to your question in long form, where a lot of people go wrong is they read the words in a book, they hear them as if they were a conversation. Now I want you to ask yourself, I just said something moderately interesting about hotel shower soap, but could you play back the exact words that I said? No. Could you go back to that visualization if you stopped to think about that hotel, or could you go back to that image of what’s on your mother’s nightstand? Of course.
So, the words themselves are throw away, but the meanings and the visualizations are very much relevant. That’s essentially the crux of the technique, if you want to retain what you read, you need to turn it into highly visual, highly imaginative imagery. That’s it. I mean, I can definitely tell you almost none of the words in Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography, but I can paint for you of him running through the street with a wheelbarrow three to four times a day with the same bundle of paper, so people would think that he was selling more newspapers. I can tell you the image that I have for this hunta, and I can tell you the image that I have for him getting caught “borrowing” books and why he brought the concept of the public library to life. Olly: Is this because you are a visual person and you’re kind of imagining what it looks like as you’re reading? Are you reading the book and then creating that image in your mind? Jonathan: Yes, we are all visual people. Olly: Just to finish that, are you – I’m trying to think of the mechanics of how this works.
So, you’re actually reading something in the book, thinking I want to remember this point, pausing, and then creating and then working on that imagery such that you can remember it. Is that what you’re doing? Jonathan: That’s what we teach, is that you create kind of micro pauses when you’re flipping a page, try to remember pertinent details, and then at the end of the chapter, you need to go back as you’re flipping through those blank pages and review and play back these images and string them together, create a structure. The truth is that over time, and I can’t guarantee that this happens to everybody, it certainly happened to me, over time it just kind of happens.
As I’m reading, the images are just kind of cropping up for me. Again, I can’t promise that, that happens. The way that we teach it is take a pause, anyway when you speed read, it’s extraordinarily exhausting and most people, though they could theoretically read a book in two and a half, three hours, you’ve got to take breaks. So, during those breaks, you get up, you have a glass of water, you start playing back these images, and even if you want to have archival, kind of an index knowledge, you can put them into a memory palace. Although, I don’t personally do that. I don’t think you need to be able to play back, in order, the points in a Malcolm Gladwell book.
Olly: You know what? It’s absolutely fascinating. I’m kind of having a bit of an epiphany as I’m listening to you talking, because – let’s see if I can get these thoughts properly structured. The process you’ve just described of learning something new in a book, taking note of it, putting your attention on it, carrying on and then coming back to review it later, regular listeners of the podcast will know that this is exactly the way that language vocabulary is acquired. It’s a combination of attention and revision, revision in the sense of reviewing. Jonathan: Space repetition. Olly: I don’t know if this is an English word, but I think in America people understand revision to mean changing something, but anyway, I mean reviewing it as in going back to it. So, we’ve got a combination of putting your attention on stuff and then going back and reviewing it later so that your mind can have another opportunity to better structure it in your head. I’m seeing all kinds of parallels. What I hadn’t seen up until this point, I hadn’t seen those parallels, so I hadn’t really considered the fact that information, in exactly the same way as a new word in a foreign language makes perfect sense to you when you’ve just learned it, but then it disappears 30 seconds later, or the next day when you need it in a conversation, I hadn’t really considered the fact that information that you read in a book actually behaves in the same way.
When you’re reading, you think this is so cool, I didn’t know that about Benjamin Franklin, but then you don’t have the kind of awareness to think you know what, if I need to remember this tomorrow, I’m not going to be able to do it. Jonathan: Precisely. Well, I mean our brain has two dedicated centers called the hippocampi, one in the left hemisphere, one in the right hemisphere, and their job is to forget. They are particularly active during sleep, which is why if we don’t sleep we become a mess, but the brain is a forgetting machine. It needs to be, because it already consumes 20% of our energy and resources and oxygen, despite being two percent of the body’s mass. It needs to forget to make it as efficient as it is. We pay a lot of prices and a lot of costs for having this massive brain.
The entire reason that we stand up and walk the way that we do is to protect this massive mound of fat, which is by far the most sophisticated super computer known to man. There are ways to game the hippocampi. If we learn the rules that they abide by, for example they prioritize visual information, they prioritize anything that’s connected. So, if you can learn to falsify these connections, and this is the other really big tip to accelerated learning, too many people treat new information as, in fact, new.
They go okay, let me stretch out. Don’t know how to play a musical instrument, so everything that I learn about this piano is completely new and foreign to me. What does that tell the hippocampus? It says this is completely irrelevant knowledge, it has no connection to anything that I’ll ever learn, or will ever need to learn. So, basically shall we dance in Norwegian and they tell you, and you say to yourself this is the only thing that I’ve ever learned in Norwegian, and your brain goes this is the only thing we know about Norwegian, this must be pretty damn useless, and throws it out the window. But if you were to say to yourself okay, this is how this is related to this information, this is how I’m going to use this information, you can say this sounds like English except for instead of shall, we say skal, and connect it to visual imagery, maybe a tin can of Skoal chewing tobacco. You create the imagery and tell the brain hey, this is relevant, this is related, this is interesting, new and novel, and then by going back and doing that repetition as you so correctly said, we’re telling the brain I just learned this yesterday, but I’ve already reviewed it once, it must be pretty important.
This information keeps coming up, because your brain doesn’t know when you relearn something that it’s coming out of an index card or if it’s being used in the real world, it has no idea, it just says this phrase, skal vi danse, has come up twice in the last two days, that’s interesting. It must be significant . There are all these different ways, and that’s basically all we do, is we trick the brain into determining that things are important. Olly: Do you think people were efficient learners 100 years ago before radio, TV or internet? Jonathan: Well, I think about that a lot. A hundred years ago, you would get a book, most likely the Bible, because the printing press wasn’t what it is today in terms of low cost, people were actually physically printing books, so there was a high cost associated with books. Literacy rates were not as high, so if you got a book in your hot little hands, you would read that book over and over and over again and be able to cite passages from it.
I mean, even in Benjamin Franklin’s day, he set up the first public library in North America and everything, but how many books do you think he really read in his lifetime? Whereas today, we have I believe in the US there’s 300,000 new books published each year. In China, I believe it’s twice that. We’re completely bombarded with information, so we go wide instead of deep. It’s almost really hard to compare, but then you have these guys like Thomas Jefferson, like Benjamin Franklin, who were very sophisticated in many, true polymaths. You say to yourself would we all be like that if we weren’t distracted by consuming so much bullshit content, frankly.
Olly: Jonathan, you’ve studied, is it four languages, five languages? Jonathan: Studied four. Olly: How did the techniques that you’ve learned, that we’ve been talking about here, how have those techniques helped you with language learning? Jonathan: Great question. As you said for learning vocabulary, these techniques are a game changer. There’s no word too difficult, there’s no sound too confusing, because I can string words and sounds together and put them into a nice little memory palace with a visual mnemonic, and I almost don’t think of vocabulary learning at all as a hurdle anymore, it’s just straight into the brain. I actually made the mistake, when you’re a hammer, every problem is a nail as they say, so when I started to learn Russian, I was like 1200 most common Russian words, download them into my flashcard software, create visual images and boom, there we go.
I found myself, I got to about 800 words within a month or two, and then I found the grammar proved to be way more difficult and I found that these words were useless in Russian because if you don’t add – it’s not like in English where if you say, “Me want eat”, people will understand you. In Russian, they’ll go, “Who wants to eat?” Basically in Russian, if you don’t know how to declense the word, not just conjugate but declense, it loses its meaning. You could be working on the computer, or the computer could be working on you and you have no kind of way of knowing that. So, I’ve only recently adapted these techniques to learning grammar, and I’ve kind of figured out a really bizarro way to hack the Russian grammatical system, but at the very least, vocabulary has become kind of a non-issue for me.
Olly: What’s the super learner approach to a problem like grammar, which is not just a case of memorizing specific units of information like vocabulary? Do you approach grammar the same way that you’d approach a book on chocolate making? How do you approach that? How do you see the problem, the challenge or the opportunity? Jonathan: What I see it as is a list of rules, and this is maybe not the right way, but this is kind of how my mind thinks. It’s a list of rules, so let’s take for example in English if it’s singular, then the verb becomes pluralized.
He wants, he goes, she wants, she goes, you want, you go, that’s very strange, but let’s go ahead and say they want, he wants. I need to figure out a way to create that linkage, get those neurons to link together for something that is a bit weird and strange. Why isn’t it he want? In other languages – in Hebrew, it’s he want, they wants. It makes more sense intuitively, why is that? So, what I would do is create a visual image to say, for example, grammar is hard and you should never have to go it alone, so I would create this image of this person singularly going, he’s going, he goes, but he needs to bring two goes with him.
Maybe it’s two arrows, because he shouldn’t have to face this grammatical challenge alone. Whereas if they go, they don’t need to bring multiple verbs with them, because they’re together facing this challenge of grammar. So, I would just remember that it takes three people or more to tackle some grammar. I just made this up completely on the spot, but I have this visualization of going up against a wall of grammar, and that way I remember it. If it’s you, I say you, therefore it’s you and I, because I’m kind of the observer, the second person, so we will go and face it together. So, we can use go instead of you goes. That’s just kind of one example where I would say to myself this is how you conjugate. It’s basically, it’s creating BS meaning, so that I can tell the brain this is how it all links together, then I form a visualization. Olly: I guess mnemonics – you would call mnemonics BS meaning as well, right? It’s just the scaffold or a bridge to get you to the point where your brain can make sense of it enough to retain it, and then that gives you a path back in later when you need to get back to it.
Jonathan: Totally. Olly: My mind is kind of spinning at the opportunities, mostly for things that I could learn. Not just for – it’s not only very, very intriguing the opportunities for language learning, but also I feel like all these – when I think about earlier I mentioned silly things like chocolate making and children’s book illustrator, things that I just do for fun, things that I’ve been putting them off for years, because it’s just one more thing. Stuff that I could do for fun just gets pushed down the list for me, and it’s really made me think if I can learn some of these skills quickly and it doesn’t have to be a two year undertaking, when I start a new language, I consider it to be a multi-year undertaking, but learning to make nice chocolate, I could learn fairly simple, and it’s a question of remember the steps, remembering the baking temperatures and all that. So, I’m super inspired, and I’m feeling good. What can I say? You run the Super Learner Academy, this is where you teach, this is where you do your work, and this is where you teach the accelerated learning skills that we’ve been talking about today.
Tell us about that. Who should consider it, what’s involved, what do you learn? Jonathan: So, about a year and some change ago, we decided that we wanted to create the absolute finest accelerated learning program that money could buy. The result was something that we call the super learner master class. It’s a 10 week comprehensive program, you can go through it faster, you can go through it slower, but paced out at about 30 minutes a day, four to five times a week, it is about 10 weeks.
A lot of that 30 minutes is hey, you’re going to read your emails, you’re going to read the newspaper, do it in this specific way. So, it’s not all watching videos and stuff like that, I don’t expect anyone to watch that many videos of me. Essentially what it is, is it starts with a very strong core understanding in memory and mnemonic technique. So, all these things that I told you about; how to memorize information, numbers, names, how to store your information long term, how to review it, or as you said revise it in a way that is going to allow you to remember it forever, because no amount of mnemonic technique is going to put it in your brain forever.
You have to kind of be intelligent about the intervals in which you review and how you review. Then it goes into speed reading. So, it’s about 70% memory, 30% speed reading. Once you have that infrastructure, you can then go on and learn anything, and most of what you’re going to want to learn is, of course, in books, although we do talk a little bit about how do I take on a challenge like Olympic weightlifting, for example, which cannot really be learned in books, and how do you take on a challenge like acro-yoga, which definitely cannot be learned in books. That’s it. It’s essentially a comprehensive program. Of course, we offer a free trial if people want to check it out, where they can sign up, no credit card required, and do the first entire module of the course.
So, diagnose their reading, diagnose their memory, start to understand some of the fundamentals, download all the worksheets, set their goals, set their progress, understand exactly what the hell I’m talking about throughout the course, and really set themselves up. Then if they want to, they can always upgrade and unlock the other, I believe it’s eight more modules or nine more modules. Olly: That’s great, so you can take the time to get a feel for it.
Certainly what struck me when I went through the course was the quality of the production. You must have really put your heart and soul into creating this, the quality – I’ve never seen anything like it. Jonathan: Thank you. As you can see, if people are watching the video, I really believe in super high quality. In fact, we’ve now invested in a studio of our own, this studio that I’m in now. I look back on those videos and I’m like we’ve got to clean up the audio, we’ve got to do this, because we’re always trying to push the bar. If I can get to a point where it’s as close to being in the room with me in terms of quality, that takes that whole distraction of echo in the room, or blurry camera out of the way and allows the student to really focus in on the content.
It’s like if a car is smooth enough, you almost forget you’re riding on a bumpy road, and that’s what I want people to experience. Olly: Wonderful. Well listen, it’s been such a pleasure to talk to you today, I learned a lot as always. If people want to get in touch with you, where can they do so? Jonathan: So, they can check my personal website at jle.vi.
They can check out my podcast at BecomingASuperHuman.com. We’ve had such illustrious guests as Mr. Olly Richard on this show. Olly: That was a fun episode, that was a good chat. Jonathan: That was really fun. People really enjoyed it as well. I assume you’ll give them a link to get access to that free trial. Olly: Yes, we’ll tell people where to go for that. Lovely. Well, thanks very much, and I look forward to the next time, and we’ll talk very soon.
Jonathan: Take care. Olly: Bye, bye..
For More Info : Self improvement

Tuesday, 23 January 2018

HOSTILES ON THE HILL” — A Bad Lip Reading of The Empire Strikes Back


*** You can turn these captions off and on with the CC button Hey Dak, you got that backing track? Turn it on! Oh yeah Go ahead, pump it up Uh, I’d love to catch a firefly that’s far away I see your whole crew staring as I put this beat down Mmm, you’re like a soup can I’m like Superman I saw Veronica the girl that put you OFF blast Cause you played harmonica in art class I know you want her, too But you don’t move ’cause you don’t have any shoes You touch a pom-pom I touch an A-Bomb Mmm, aw yeahhh Oh look it’s a bad guy Don’t worry about it, Darius Cuz I’m a mile high and I’m the scariest I ride so hard I got you tripping You seeing how I’m flowing not dripping I think YOU’RE tripping, dog I’ll pour sauce all up on your very nice pants I like romance, you can’t dance Heart attack on deck, ain’t got a chance Kinda bright out, think I’ll put your lights out It’s not about what they want You just gotta walk your walk It’s not about what you wear It’s all about where you are I wish I wasn’t so dang sweet I wish I wasn’t so dang sweet So dang sweet, so dang sweet I wish I wasn’t so dang sweet You are like cinnamon Hey guys what you doing? Come again? I’m avoiding death And I’m really freaking Thinking somebody’s gonna shoot me You’ll be good bro I just wanna see a tree And you will! GYahhH! NO I WON’T! Sassy bad guy what do you wanna say? Before my friend pulls your legs away Cuz pretty soon, you’ll literally be tripping Here comes a hot poker What we do is wrap it wrap it round round Then we make it fall down You are like cinnamon! I wish I wasn’t so dang sweet, so dang sweet, so dang sweet What we do is wrap it wrap it round round Then we make it fall down You are like cinnamon! Hey see if you can give it more bass Hey! Where’s the music Dak is dead I wish I wasn’t so dang sweet, so dang sweet, so dang sweet It’s not about what they want You just gotta walk your walk I wish I wasn’t so dang sweet, so dang sweet, so dang sweet It’s not about what you wear [guttural growling sound] Dak? Hey guys! I think – I think Dak is a zombie! Really? What do you mean? I mean he’s a freaking zombie! But wait, didn’t your ship just get shot? Yes, but…
ZOMBIE That IS terrible Yeah, you think? You are like cinnamon!.
For More Info : Self improvement

Wednesday, 17 January 2018

What Is It Like To Be Deaf?


HEY THERE! WELCOME TO LIFE NOGGIN. EVERY WEEK I MAKE VIDEOS AND USE MY VOICE TO EDUCATE PEOPLE ALL OVER, BUT NOT EVERYONE CAN HEAR WHAT I’M SAYING. MY BUDDY RIKKI HERE IS ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE. SHE’S A MEMBER OF THE DEAF COMMUNITY. SO RIKKI, WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE DEAF AND WHAT’S LIFE LIKE? WELL, BY SOME DEFINITIONS, DEAF USUALLY IMPLIES HAVING LITTLE OR NO FUNCTIONAL HEARING, WHILE HARD OF HEARING USUALLY IMPLIES THAT A PERSON HAS MILD-TO-MODERATE HEARING LOSS. BUT IT IS UP TO EACH INDIVIDUAL TO CHOOSE HOW THEY IDENTIFY. HOWEVER, AUDIOLOGISTS TEND TO REFER TO US AS “HEARING IMPAIRED”, WHICH IS A TERM THAT DEAF PEOPLE OFTEN DISLIKE. ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF, THE HARD OF HEARING AND DEAF COMMUNITY IS QUITE DIVERSE. THERE ARE DEAF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN MAINSTREAMED, MEANING THEY ATTENDED PUBLIC SCHOOLS. THOSE WHO WERE MAINSTREAMED MAY USE AN ASL INTERPRETER, SPOKEN LANGUAGE AND/OR LIP READING. LIP READING IS NOT 100% EFFECTIVE THOUGH AND ONLY 30-40% OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, FOR EXAMPLE, CAN BE READ ON THE LIPS UNDER THE BEST CONDITIONS.
THEN THERE ARE THOSE WHO ATTEND DEAF SCHOOLS, WHERE ALL EDUCATION IS DONE IN SIGN LANGUAGE AND ALL THE STUDENTS ARE DEAF. PEOPLE FROM BOTH MAINSTREAM SCHOOLS AND DEAF SCHOOLS (BUT NOT ALL) ARE ALSO PART OF DEAF CULTURE: A SET OF LEARNED BEHAVIORS OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO ARE DEAF AND WHO HAVE THEIR OWN LANGUAGE, RULES, AND TRADITIONS. DEAFNESS IS NOT ONE SIZE FITS ALL. SOME OF US MAY BE ABLE TO HEAR HIGH PITCHED TONES WHILE SOME MAY BE ABLE TO HEAR DEEPER TONES, OR SOME MAY CANNOT HEAR ANYTHING AT ALL. WHAT I MAY BE ABLE TO HEAR A LITTLE BETTER, THEY MAY NOT AND VICE VERSA. THOSE WHO GREW UP IN DEAF CULTURE TEND TO USE SIGN LANGUAGE. SIGN LANGUAGE IS A COMPLETE AND COMPLEX LANGUAGE THAT USES SIGNS MADE BY HAND MOVEMENTS, COMBINED WITH FACIAL EXPRESSIONS AND BODY POSTURES THAT ARE AN INTEGRAL PART TO SIGN LANGUAGE’S GRAMMAR. HOWEVER, IT’S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT NO FORM OF SIGN LANGUAGE IS UNIVERSAL. AND THEN, OF COURSE, YOU WILL FIND DEAF PEOPLE WHO USE BOTH SPOKEN LANGUAGE AND SIGN LANGUAGE TO COMMUNICATE.
SO THE WAY A PERSON CAN BECOME DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING CAN VARY, BUT WHAT ARE SOME COMMONS WAYS? WELL, SOME PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY BORN DEAF DUE TO GENETIC REASONS. OTHER WAYS THAT PEOPLE EITHER BECOME DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING CAN INCLUDE A PREGNANCY OR CHILDHOOD RELATED ILLNESS, INJURIES TO THE HEAD, OR PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO A LOUD ENOUGH NOISE. SOMETIMES THE COCHLEA OR COCHLEAR NERVE IS TARGETED, WHICH CAN GET IN THE WAY OF ELECTRICAL IMPULSES MEANT TO REACH THE BRAIN. OTHER TIMES THE TINY BONES INSIDE THE MIDDLE EAR FAIL TO PASS ALONG SOUND WAVES. IT CAN ALSO END UP BEING A MIX OF DIFFERENT THINGS GOING ON INSIDE FOR SOME PEOPLE. ALSO, HEARING AIDS OR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS MIGHT BE USED TO HELP ENHANCE THE HEARING OF MEMBERS FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT CAN STILL HEAR.
KEEP IN MIND THAT BOTH OF THESE PIECES OF TECHNOLOGY ARE SIMPLY ASSISTIVE TOOLS, NOT CURES, AND THEY DON’T WORK FOR ALL DEAF PEOPLE. OVERALL, BEING DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING IS OFTEN NOT SEEN AS A DISABILITY BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY, BUT RATHER A CULTURAL IDENTITY THAT STEMS FROM THEIR DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE. WITH THE RIGHT MIX OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY, SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE, AND EDUCATION, BEING DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING DOESN’T NEED TO BE LIMITING TO A PERSON’S LIFE. THE MAIN PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE LACK OF UNDERSTANDING IN SOCIETY OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING FROM THOSE THAT ARE NOT A PART OF THE COMMUNITY. THIS CAN TOTALLY BE HELPED THOUGH, BY EDUCATING OUR FRIENDS AND BY PORTRAYING REALISTIC DEPICTIONS OF THOSE FROM THE COMMUNITY IN OUR ARTS, LIKE LITERATURE AND FILM. WE JUST NEED MORE AUTHENTIC DEAF REPRESENTATION. SO ARE YOU FRIENDS WITH ANY MEMBERS OF THE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING COMMUNITY? ARE YOU APART OF THAT COMMUNITY? IF YOU’RE COMFORTABLE WITH IT, SHARE YOUR STORIES IN THE COMMENTS BELOW! IF WANNA LEARN MORE, DON’T FORGET TO CHECK OUT RIKKI’S AWESOME CHANNEL WHERE SHE GOES MORE INTO DETAIL OF HER PERSONAL EXPERIENCES WITH BEING DEAF.
AS ALWAYS, I’M BLOCKO AND THIS HAS BEEN LIFE NOGGIN. DON’T FORGET TO KEEP ON THINKING!.
For More Info : Reading speed test

Thursday, 11 January 2018

Why America still uses Fahrenheit


And… Alexa, what’s the weather today? with clear skies and sun. Today’s forecast has partly sunny weather with a high of 77°F and a low of 61°F. UHHHH… I still don’t understand the use of Fahrenheit. Virtually every country on earth uses Celsius to measure temperature. But the US still uses Fahrenheit. And for that reason, we —at Vox— often get comments like these. *Okay, we get it.* Besides the fact that the majority of the world uses it— the metric system makes conversions a lot easier. The Celsius scale even looks simpler. It has freezing and boiling points at nice, round numbers— zero and 100. Where in Fahrenheit, it’s a bit of a mess.
And of course, this isn’t just an issue of aesthetics or weather updates. America’s unwillingness to switch over to the metric system has had serious consequences. In 1999, a 125 million dollar satellite sent to Mars, disappeared in the Martian atmosphere. It’s a setback to years of work already done in the vastness of space— all it takes is one navigation error. And this colossal mistake was largely due to a conversion error between US and metric measurements. Fahrenheit was really useful n the early 18th century. At the time, no one really had a consistent way to measure temperature. But then a German scientist, came up with the Fahrenheit scale when he invented the mercury thermometer in 1714. To make the scale, the most popular theory is that he picked the temperature of an ice/water/salt mixture at the zero mark. He then put the freezing point of water, which is higher than a salt mixture, at 32. And placed the average temperature of the human body at 96.
From there, he placed the boiling point of water at 212 degrees. In 1724, Fahrenheit formalized that scale and was inducted into the British Royal Society, where his system was a big hit. As Britain conquered huge parts of the globe in the 18th and 19th centuries, it brought the Fahrenheit system and other Imperial measurements, such as feet and ounces along with them. And Fahrenheit became a standard system for the British Empire across the globe. In the meantime, the metric system was gaining popularity during the French Revolution. It was put in place to unify the country at the national level. So by the second half of the 20th century, Celsius became popular in many parts of the world, when many English-speaking countries began using the metric system. Even America attempted to switch over. The change would have been good for trade and scientific communications with the rest of the world. So, Congress passed a law, the 1975 Metric Conversion Act— Which led to the United States Metric Board that would educate people about the system.
This created the only metric highway sign in the US— the Interstate 19 connecting Arizona to Mexico. But it didn’t go much further than that. The problem was that unlike the UK, Canada or Australia, the law made the switch voluntary instead of mandatory. And of course people resisted the change, and the Metric Board couldn’t enforce the conversion. So, President Reagan ended up disbanding the board in 1982. The next nudge to metricate came when the metric system became the preferred measure for American trade and commerce in 1988.
But nothing really stuck with the general public… …Even though bizarre measurements like Feet and Fahrenheit are not doing them any favors. Students have to train for two sets of measurements, making science education even more difficult. And companies spend extra dollars producing two sets of products, one for the US and the other for metric. There’s also an argument for public health. According to the CDC, about 3 to 4000 kids are brought to the ER due to unintentional medication overdose, every year.
And conversion errors for dosage are to blame. So it seems like a no brainer— America needs to switch to the metric system to match the rest of the world. But it is still struggling to make that change. That’s because it’ll take a lot of time and money but there’s no financial proof that this will all be worth it. So unless that change is proven to be economically better… We’re not going to be using celsius anytime soon. What’s 77°F in Celsius? 77°F is 25°C. Ah! Okay..
For More Info : Light Speed Reading

Wednesday, 10 January 2018

High Speed Photography: Capteur de Contact : explosion d’un ballon d’eau par contact de l’eau


Hello Welcome to this step by step n° 4 for Multi Pilot Pro Today we will see together how to make the photo of balloon filled with water which explodes To undoubtedly make a success, we will use a new sensor The Contact sensor In fact it is rather an interface it is sufficient just to make electrical contact between the 2 poles for automatically sending his order enclosure Flash. Actually the case is settled as for other experiments : a minimum delay and an activation of 3 seconds The output is enabled if the Entry n° 1 past from ON to OFF or vice versa We can also look at the page that indicates the power value of the n° 1 We are currently in Standard mode, it is not a microphone The sensitivity is at 1 and you see below the level It is the voltage measured across the 2 terminals You see a number that oscillates around 3200 : these are Millivolts also 3 Volts There is no problem with a lower voltage to play with water You have any security problem.

The proof ! Nothing to fear So we can plug into the interface of the 4 mm banana plugs or screw with the terminal block of the classical bare wires As soon as the 2 sons touch we will trigger the Flash However according to the origin of your water you can have a surprise Watch ! Is that water does not lead to electricity, yes but very low ! In fact if you look at the voltage of the input n° 1 it did not fall enough He will have to adjust the threshold of the enclosure. It is on the next page you press 2 times on “+” that you do have the outbreak. You need to solve a voltage high enough so that it detects more easily a small current There I have set it to its maximum value : 2055mV I will back the 2 electrodes in water And you have a sure trigger. So what is the principle to get the picture? We have a balloon that is filled with water We will soak a first wire in the balloon and then with a second we will puncture the balloon.

As soon as the rubber will be torn apart there is an electrical conduction between the 2 wires and the box will send the order to the Flash to fire. Yet once we will work in the dark. The camera will be set to 2 seconds to F8 Flash will be set to 1/32 of power. We have a lot of reflection in the balloon And you can also make direct or indirect lighting test through the mass of water which gives excellent results. So much for the theory. We will go to the practice. I will prepare a peak to skewer by welding a small connector. But you can also use scotch. We will puncture the balloon with this pic. It will have to spend the second thread in the balloon. To do this you catch it, the weight of the water is expected to drag a wire to the bottom. You must work with the rubber more or less tended to allow the thread to pass.

This is. If you want to do things in a way very practical. You are going to do a hook ceiling that will hold the ball. Exactly where the focusing was made. Of course the setting will be in manual because we work in the dark. Then a small container coming to get 3/4 of water. There I worked with a small balloon to not wet my camera’s studio. But the most spectacular photos will be made with a ball of 30 cm of diameter. That will inflate with 3 or 4 litres of water. Better to be in a place that does not fear the humidity. And this will require that I burst the balloon. The timeout is currently 0 milli seconds. To get a picture at his tear We will repeat the phrase on this photo The Photos of the tear on the first line are between 0 and 2 milli seconds on a 16 cm diameter balloon once completed with water To have a photo of the ball that retracts is in a range between 2 and 20 milli seconds And to really get the ball clear of the rubber will choose an interval between 20 and 40–50 milli seconds.

At 200 milli seconds water has already left the fields photographed. I set the timeout to 2 milli seconds I put the self-timer device and we will to dive in the dark I trigger the camera with the self timer I place myself above the shutter You can see that there is water everywhere despite the recipient which still salvaged a part. After you have to fill the balloon of the same amount of water and to experiment with other timers to go a little earlier or a little later in the phenomen. Good experience..

For More Info : Light speed reading

Tuesday, 2 January 2018

Speed of light and distance from sun (scientific notation word problem) | Pre-Algebra | Khan Academy



The speed of light is 3 times 10 to the eighth meters per second. So as you can tell, light is very fast, 3 times 10 to the eighth meters per second. If it takes 5 times 10 to the second power seconds for light to travel from the sun to the earth– let’s think about that a little bit. 5 times 10 to the second, that’s 500 seconds. You have 60 seconds in a minute, so 8 minutes would be 480 seconds.
So 500 seconds would be about 8 minutes, 20 seconds. It takes 8 minutes, 20 seconds for light to travel from the sun to the earth. What is the distance, in meters, between the sun and the earth? They’re giving us a rate. They’re giving us a speed. They’re giving us a time. And they want to find a distance. This goes straight back to the standard distance is equal to rate times time.
So they give us the rate. The rate is 3 times 10 to the eighth meters per second. That right there is the rate. They give us the time. The time is 5 times 10 to the second seconds. I’ll just use that with a S. How many meters? So what is the distance? And so we can just move these around from the commutative and the associative properties of multiplication. And actually, you can multiply the units. That’s called dimensional analysis. When you multiply the units, you kind of treat them like variables. You should get the right dimensions for distance. So let’s just rearrange these numbers. This is equal to 3 times 5– I’m just commuting and reassociating these numbers and this product, because we’re just multiplying everything– 3 times 5 times 10 to the eighth times 10 to the second. And then we’re going to have meters per second times seconds. And if you treated these like variables, these seconds would cancel out with that seconds right there, and you would just be left with the unit meters, which is good, because we want a distance in just meters. How does this simplify? This gives us 3 times 5 is 15.
15 times 10 to the eighth times 10 squared. We have the same base. We’re taking the product, so we can add the exponents. This is going to be 10 to the 8 plus 2 power, or 10 to the 10th power. Now you might be tempted to say that we’re done, that we have this in scientific notation. But remember, in scientific notation this number here has to be greater than or equal to 1 and less than 10. This clearly is not less than 10. So how do we rewrite this? We can write 15 as 1.5. This clearly is greater than 1 and less than 10. And to get from to 15, you have to multiply by 10.
One way to think about it is 15 is 15.0, and so you have a decimal here. If we’re moving the decimal one to the left to make it 1.5, that’s essentially dividing by 10. Moving the decimal to the left means you’re dividing by 10. If we don’t want to change the value of the number, we need to divide by 10 and then multiply by 10. So this and that are the same number. Now 15 is times 10, and then we have to multiply that times 10 to the 10th power, this right over here. 10 is really just 10 to the first power. So we can just add the exponents. Same base, taking the product. This is equal to times 10 to the 1 plus 10 power, or 10 to the 11th power. And we are done. This is a huge distance. It’s very hard to visualize. But anyway, hopefully you enjoyed that..
For More Info : Light speed reading